Kalash

What was the point of posting this if you had nothing to release?

And wtf, pricing?

The thread seemed biased from the beginning. Clearly Derex wants Multi-processing, why are you asking users to choose...make the branch / fork & start working on it - make a post on the forum and there begins the rewrite?

Run along little one.

Git is based on a SHA1 hash of commit. That way, it's not based on "rev numbers" but individual changes.

If I pull your change, it won't be different from someone else pulling your change. We will both be getting commit <SHA1 ID> rather than rev 23, 55, 1230.

what the hell wrong with you people?

1. @Kalash: Writing patches and managing them is also easier and faster.

you are absolutely retarded and stupid if you think so. really.

you give me argument why

* creating patch

* uploading it somewhere

* waiting for it to be applied

* getting response it cant be applied because of conflicts

* fixing patch or fixing working repo and recreating patch

* re-uploading patch

* waiting for patch to be applied

easier than just fork repository, create branch and request for pulling?

until you give me reasonable arguments - you are retarded and stupid for me. because you dont read and dont learn and only can write complains.

2. Having no revision numbers is a complete mess of things.

why is it mess?

why UDB/whatever guys cannot make a fork of mangos on github and commit their patches with whatever numbering they want?

all they need is to pull from mangos/master and add their sql update or whatever - voila. you dont have to deal with any revision numbers.

same thing with scripting engines - make a fork and update it from master whenever you want. fix crashes and name your branch stable.

what is so hard about it?

nobody has to deal wuth any revision numbering crap.

You do realize that my retarded, stupid self, was complimenting Git rather than SVN, right?

Right. :rolleyes:

Installation of MaNGOS for hours???

I can't belive that actually, the GIT is speed improvement for me.

Last time I tried to fetch a patch from SVN for hours, it was failing every time.

Correct.

Writing patches and managing them is also easier and faster.

Overly exaggerated analogy, but it's like liposuction. You could exercise, and put in the effort to lose the fat, or go to the "easy" alternative.

MaNGOS allowed my to explore Git, and enjoy it for its advantages. I'm making the transition to stop using SVN as I find Git to be a much better solution

I'm of interest of this particular topic. I remembered that around revision 3000 or so, usually those who were trying to setup MaNGOS for a small server would execute the realmd.sql & characters.sql into 1 database. Is this habit still going strong? I'd like to know. Please kindly answer to the poll question and leave any comments that may contribute to this topic, and why such and such practice is more important than the other.

Regards.