rultin

Ok...I just tested something...Admin account was set to level 3. Ra.MinLevel was set to level 3...and I would get the errors I mentioned. Changing the Account to a value HIGHER than 3 and now the functions work. So for whatever reason the Ra.MinLevel has to be exceeded by the account logging into Moble Mangos. Not that I care having my GM account set to 4 or 5...but it would be nice if I set something to a certain level and Moble Mangos recognized it as being that level.

Hmmmm...The account I log into Moble Mangos with IS set to level 3. And I get those errors on my phone. The account I logged into the game was a player account. So it's still not working as it should.

Currently there are no players online. So 'account onlinelist' doesn't report anything while working with the Server Console directly. I logged in one of my test characters and get this ======================================================================================== | ID | Account | Character | IP | GM | Expansion | ======================================================================================== | 2 | RULTIN| Saltychicken | 192.168.0.2 | 0 | 2 | ======================================================================================== If I then go onto my phone and select Online Players in Moble Mangos I get this Account Name: the Online Players Name: access IP address: level ________________________________ Account Name: Command Online Players Name: account IP address: have and then at the bottom of the screen I get that java.lang message.

10654 - the only modification is the auctionhouse bot...everything else is stock I get Error: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

Is there any reason why it doesn't display the online players for me?? Everything else seems to work...except for the Message Player and Online Players.

I am using your current Repo...and AHBuyer is not working. Settings are correct in Database and it is enabled. AuctionHouseBot.Seller.Enabled = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Buyer.Enabled = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Account = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Character = 1530 AuctionHouseBot.Items.Vendor = 0 AuctionHouseBot.Items.Loot = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Items.Misc = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Bind.No = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Bind.Pickup = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Bind.Equip = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Bind.Use = 1 AuctionHouseBot.Bind.Quest = 1 AuctionHouseBot.ItemsPerCycle = 500 AuctionHouseBot.BuyPrice.Seller = 1 AuctionHouseBot.BuyPrice.Buyer = 0

Just me or is the AH Buyer not buying for everyone else?? I've yet to get this to function despite everything that's been going on with AHBot lately...I've pulled a clean Mangos and followed the instructions in this thread...and yet the AH Buyer won't give up the gold!

Awesome...this will help immensely...thanks for doing this!

It would be really nice if your patch file was generic instead of needing specific folder structures. I try your method and Tortoise just complains about the directory. Even when I create a folder structure to match yours...it still doesn't see what it needs to see.

It's not necessary to make it compile with each new commit of Mangos...Are most of us running a new compile every single day? Impossible to get any real testing done if that's the case. Anyways...A weekly update wouldn't be bad...just need something more standard and consistent because this current method of getting it updated is driving me crazy.

This thread is getting way out of control and is getting confusing to follow with multiple people posting patches and telling everyone different ways to apply patches or merge branches... Could we maybe get this thread locked? Have a new thread created by someone who is going to watch and maintain this Core Mod? Provide a rewritten first post with instructions on how to get this code and apply it to Mangos git clone? Perhaps just git pull to merge? (I may be wrong but a simple git clone of mangos followed by a git pull from an AHBot source should be all that's necessary)...Something more clear and concise than what is currently going on. Every day I check this thread there is yet another person providing a different patch and some other way to apply it. Perhaps I'm out of line...but it seems whenever the current "guardian" of AHBot steps away for awhile we've gotten a new thread so that the new person can keep the first thread updated with relevant information.

It should be noted that the Mangos Config file items for AHBot were changed. Everything compiled fine for me...and AHBot started during the Mangos start up. Yet I still had nothing in the AH...so I went and looked at the config file... Just thought I would mention in case some people didn't catch that. The post by vladex is why I though people may need to look into this as a possible reason AHBot is not working despite compiling fine.

Not sure how...but running Trinity with a 2.4.3 client...If horde and alliance are in the same party (allowed by setting the config option)...they can trade with each other (allowed by setting the config option)...Yet when they are not partied it does not let them trade. So the Server must in fact have the ability to override the DBC files. I believe some DBC files simply provide labels or data for whatever is told to the client by the server. They are not necessarily points of data that the client is ONLY allowed to use. If Horde and Alliance was hard coded...then you couldn't set the flag and let them party together.

So because I DO READ the announcements and it was CLEARLY stated in theLuda's post that GIT would be mirrored to SVN and the link in THAT announcement still shows Revision 6767... Come on...you close my topic because the Dev's have failed to come through on something they said would happen??? What gives...perhaps we are now seeing CLEARLY why there has been problems of late with the dev teams. Why the desire to quell and shut people up when they are trying to get some anwers. Quote from Announcements "Greetings, in the light of MaNGOS development switching to Git for version control, many community members have told us that using Git would not be userfriendly or lack system integration under Windows (as there is nothing like TortoiseSVN for Git). In the last few days I have been writing a script that will automatically import all Git commits into the Sourcefourge SVN repository. I am currently testing this with a mirror of the Git repository and a mirror of the SVN repository. Within the next week you can expect so see this going online within the next few days if no major issues show up. Update The Git repository will be mirrored to the old SourceForge.net SVN living on http://mangos.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mangos/. Commits will only go into the trunk/ and only from the master branch on GitHub. Thus development branches on GitHub will not be available on SVN. The mirror will be updated once a day ~ 21:00h CET. " this was posted by TheLuda... If this information has changed then THIS first post should have been updated with the appropriate information. Instead some moderator links to a completely different SVN and tells me that I should have read the announcements. What is wrong with you people. Try being helpful and don't CLOSE every topic because you are afraid to give us some answers. As for using GIT...I will be using GIT...I will learn it at a time of my choosing. When it actually functions with simplicity with an integrated GUI...but as it was designed for Linux users who believe the command prompt reigns supreme this will probably not happen. So in reality the choices of the Mangos Dev have caused the division amongst the community. I can see clearly now the rain is gone. Must make people feel uber that they can close topics and post responses that don't provide any explainations. Seriously...get over yourselves.

What's the deal here? We were told that it would be mirrored for awhile and the SVN is STILL at 6767...so much for keeping their word.

@Kray - I think you raise some good points. It feels to me that the move to Git was because it's the "latest" thing. Once something else shows up I worry that the Devs will decide to move yet again. There are how many Paste Bin type sites out there now? People always seem to be driven by "trends". I agree with the person who said that the Dev's should have been talking about this move and asking for community input before making the decision. Frankly...without the community providing feedback (positive or negative) then the Dev's have nothing. A decision can NOT be simply made on what's best for the Dev's. The decision SHOULD have been made with EVERYONE in consideration. It's VERY clear that the majority of people were not thought of when the Git move was decided. It does NOT matter if the Dev's use Git on Windows....Bravo...I applaud you. This does NOT mean that those of us who do NOT want to take the time to learn a new system have to like the change. There are many of us who wish to have a KISS process when working with testing Mangos. I do NOT care how good Git is for the Dev's. If it is that great for the Dev's then THEY should use. If the community feels that SVN is best for US then the Dev's need to listen to that as well. The solution here should be Git for those that want to use it and SVN for those that want to use it. How hard would it be for the Dev's to do a nightly commit to SVN with the latest main branch of Git???? Come on...those of us who don't want to change to Git are being told WE are the lazy ones for not attempting to learn a new system. The Dev's are lazy themselves if they can't accomodate the community.

But those two things are important to many people.

Much appreciated...I'm so glad that you are working to make this function. I think this is all that people wanted...A choice. Who knows perhaps while SVN is still available it allows some of us to play around with Git, but not rely upon it...which would ease any transition...and if enough people do this then maybe SVN will no longer be needed.... Change is fine...easing into it is much less difficult than the change being abrupt.

From everything I've read though it seems that all available patches need to be converted to Git. So AH Bot and whatever else people are working on needs to be converted. I also think the loss of revision numbers is going to cause ALOT of headaches for everyone. I'm already reading many complaints about Git...and not just because people don't want to accept change.

Not to start a debate about Linux vs. Windows...the OS we use and the interfaces we use are chosen because they make sense to us. I choose to use Windows for the bulk of everything I do because it just makes sense to me. Learning to use something like Tortoise SVN is much simpler and makes life easier. So it goes to say...I feel it's very unfortunate that Mangos has moved to github.com It's not that I "can't" learn to use something new...it's that I'm extremely comfortable and enjoy how simplistic things were. Now I have this Cygwin installed and quite frankly...I don't feel like dealing with a command line. So what other options do I have? I feel it's very short sited that an Open Source project has taken a turn and seems to becoming platform specific. Developing on Linux may be easier and better for some...that is YOUR opinion...and you are entitled too it...I just don't see why the Source Code can't be hosted somewhere that provides an equal footing for Windwos and Linux users alike. Everything I am reading keeps telling me that Git is "linux" and even the Git and GitHUB guides say that Git doesn't work properly with Cygwin... Thank you Manogs for making life difficult when things worked fine. Perhaps there are other options for SVN hosting that don't come with speed issues. I realize the current SVN host was having issues...but to change COMPLETELY how things are done...that just plain sucks. I think you may very well lose alot of people that follow and use Mangos. What next? Will things change again when something new rears it's head? Will Mangos go the way of "follow the popular trends"? Boo I say...