SilverIce
Members-
Posts
68 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Donations
0.00 GBP
SilverIce's Achievements
Advanced Member (3/3)
0
Reputation
-
In [11825]. Thank you
-
It was added two days ago
-
Need implement gameobject_addon table that will hold additional per-guid gameobject data - in current case it's elevator's path rotation(four GAMEOBJECT_PARENTROTATION fields)
-
Movement related bug I found on oregon mangos & trinity.
SilverIce replied to Midna's topic in OldBug reports
Thank you, nice catch This should be noticeable when server changes MOVE_RUN_BACK/MOVE_SWIM_BACK speed and it becames too low or grows unexpectedly -
Creature::ForcedDespawn, RFD crashs should be fixed in [11777]
-
Fixed in [11777]. Thanks for reporting
-
I think now movement part of mmap code can be simplified alot or maybe removed at all
-
Gnarlee, that issue has been fixed in [11667]
-
MSG_MOVE_SET_COLLISION_HGT broadcasted to eveyone except mover: {mover_guid, MovementInfo, float height}. You may look at how it implemented here
-
[11193][performance] Visibility updates and relocations
SilverIce replied to a topic in ... acceptedOld
In [11193]. Thank you very much kero99 and Undergarun -
[11193][performance] Visibility updates and relocations
SilverIce replied to a topic in ... acceptedOld
The problems that were reported by players are not such a big problem(already fixed) compared to CPU load problem, which is a mystery for me -
[11193][performance] Visibility updates and relocations
SilverIce replied to a topic in ... acceptedOld
We have taken the most effective parts from the both branches and merged them. It's even possible it would bring more performance than second branch! (It's assumption only, testing required) Please, compare: merged branch: https://github.com/SilverIce/mangos/tree/relocation_opt_merged with branch2: https://github.com/SilverIce/mangos/tree/visibility_op2_simplified -
[11193][performance] Visibility updates and relocations
SilverIce replied to a topic in ... acceptedOld
Thank you for tests, Undergarun As i can see from your post, AI notifications consumes much more CPU's power(~30%) than visibility update operations (~5% only) I will take look at it. Both branches(old_way and simplified) have this problem? -
my congratz, zergtmn
-
[11193][performance] Visibility updates and relocations
SilverIce replied to a topic in ... acceptedOld
Thank you very much for your tests branch1 compilation fixed now: i hadn't too much time to fix it earlier
Contact Us
To contact us
click here
You can also email us at [email protected]
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
You can also email us at [email protected]
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © getMaNGOS. All rights Reserved.
This website is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®
This website is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®