[fix][6951] Exception For Pounce

[Auntie Mangos]

What bug does the patch fix? What features does the patch add?

1) Fixes the facing-limitation of Pounce to fit official behaviour. Because the Spell still uses the same, old flags, like the other spells with the old behaviour (cloaked and from behind) i felt, a custom check nessecary.

2) Frenzied Regeneration will no longer benefit from +heal, as it should. This was still broken after rev6003 *removed*

For which SubVersion revision was the patch created?

whatever was up.to.date 15.Dec.2008

Is there a thread in the bug report section? If yes, please add a link to the thread.

1)Pounce

2)[bug] Druid: Frenzied Regeneration Too Hight*removed*

Who has been writing this patch? Please include either forum user names or email addresses.

Sarjuuk

1)

diff --git a/src/game/Spell.cpp b/src/game/Spell.cpp
index 297ddf6..148b89c 100644
--- a/src/game/Spell.cpp
+++ b/src/game/Spell.cpp
@@ -3501,8 +3501,12 @@ uint8 Spell::CanCast(bool strict)
        //Must be behind the target.
        if( m_spellInfo->AttributesEx2 == 0x100000 && (m_spellInfo->AttributesEx & 0x200) == 0x200 && target->HasInArc(M_PI, m_caster) )
        {
-            SendInterrupted(2);
-            return SPELL_FAILED_NOT_BEHIND;
+            //Exclusion for Pounce: Facing Limitation was removed in 2.0.1, but it still uses the same, old Ex-Flags
+            if( m_spellInfo->SpellFamilyName != SPELLFAMILY_DRUID || m_spellInfo->SpellFamilyFlags != 0x0000000000020000LL )
+            {
+                SendInterrupted(2);
+                return SPELL_FAILED_NOT_BEHIND;
+            }
        }

        //Target must be facing you.

2)

Frenzied Regen removed... (because that was hacky)

[TiGeR_asH]

devs review this please... good stuff for druids

[brats]

arent shred and ravage in SPELLFAMILY_DRUID ? if so, wont they get broken?

[Sarjuuk]

they are, but they don't use the same FamilyFlags..

if( m_spellInfo->SpellFamilyName != SPELLFAMILY_DRUID || m_spellInfo->SpellFamilyFlags != 0x0000000000020000 )

[brats]

okie .. then i see no problem with this code

[Raimisnk]

Did anyone test this patch? Code looks fine. But it's been almost a month without any news

[KAPATEJIb]

Tested, all works ok

[ipfalvim]

patch works? why not svn?

[Cocofx]

bump please fix

[Sarjuuk]

*.diff updated to rev6386

still working, still an exception

[Raimisnk]

So is this not reviewed because it's an exception? If not Someone please review this patch.

[alfcz]

Link http://paste2.org/p/35802 don't work, plese update this

[Lake292]

they wont add cause its hacky but yea works well

[Sarjuuk]

http://paste2.org/p/116092

i still hope they'll do :]

[VladimirMangos]

Patch in [6951] and backported to mangos-0.12. Thank you