Snake.Plissken

Better download the needed patches from WoW Source and update to 3.3.5a.

Confirm linux compile errors for several days. Daily downloaded from origin source. .. ../shared/Auth/libmangosauth.a(Sha1.o): In function `Sha1Hash': /usr/src/mangos/compile/build/src/shared/Auth/../../../../src/shared/Auth/Sha1.cpp:25: undefined reference to `SHA1_Init' /usr/src/mangos/compile/build/src/shared/Auth/../../../../src/shared/Auth/Sha1.cpp:25: undefined reference to `SHA1_Init' ../shared/Auth/libmangosauth.a(Sha1.o): In function `Sha1Hash::UpdateData(unsigned char const*, int)': /usr/src/mangos/compile/build/src/shared/Auth/../../../../src/shared/Auth/Sha1.cpp:35: undefined reference to `SHA1_Update' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [mangos-realmd] Fehler 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mangos/compile/build/src/realmd' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mangos/compile/build/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mangos/compile/build' make: *** [all] Fehler 2

Though some people think, svn might be better, they might be mistaken but don´t need to appologize for their opinion, probably they have their reasons. But there is no excuse and absolutely no reason to verbally attack people in that offensive way and blaming for things the judge is (not) doing for himself. If you read or misunderstood the post, who cares. If I were in your shoes, I would rethink my social skills. Think about that.

I for now will use the last changesets date plus counter if equivalent date (08101101), otherwise i use the actual date with a 00 behind the date like (08101100). Maybe this could be a possibility to coordinate actual MaNGOS state and other projects state. If the devs can't find a sollution, we need to take what we get and try our best as we did before. The problem is. not every computer uses english date conversion and needs to get converted of course

Thank you for this very helpful and ***** hint. :mad: THIS i do know. So nothing changed, we get the patch from another source and patch it as usual or how else now? This is what I wanted to know. We have now commits and branches with GIT and what else I even dare to imagine, but nobody said any word how GIT changes, if we want to add reviewed patches. Why is it so hard for some kind of people here, to give adeqate answers, that I could forget my good education.

You could add, how to apply patches like auctionhousebot, etc. Might be great. Thank you. Or didn't anything changed yet, according the patches under review?

Date with frequently changing amount of digits is crap, if you want to control all checkout/update procedures with all diffrent components. We dont need individual revs, we need one global linear refnumber from the relating source, hence MaNGOS and a fixed amount of digits would make it perfect for a long time without rewriting our scripts day in day out.

Another thing, you might want to start with complete new linear revs, please start with a fixed amount of digits, like 00000000->00000001->... Why? Many of us use scripts from compiling to installing all the needed stuff and changing amounts of digits is not good, bash commands are a little limited here. Thank you for your attention.

Acknowledged and thank you for you cooperation. *cough*

But the hashes are not linear, arent't they. How to know which hash is before another to apply changeset or other stuff. The problem is, how to reproduce the procedure to make it work in skripts, which is easy with linear number, that say not more, not less, but a megalong und nonlinear hash is not useful for other projects nor other mortal human beeings, that rely to your project. i and many many others use scripts because they don't want to update the whole stuff by hand day in day out. It's just about to get the community together again that we can work together and not the opposite. Anyway, if you're aware of this problem and step on step into our direction it's just fine and many people will be greatful. Sincerely

so? any alternative? maybe?

This is, what the devs might want Anyway let me add this nice poetry in my sig and say farewell. I'm damn close to leave aswell...

Did you read the whole thread, it's not about how to get the source, it's how to organize with other projects and scripts. Now we have a system that updates, but we don't get a rev number. Now we can write UDB_erm...MaNGOS_11102008.sql, wrf! How to get the date/rev or any other number from GIT anyays.

I suppose, even the devs noticed, that they need to develop some kind of revisions system, according the changsets, e.g. Did anybody already find a GIT command to get the actual state of the project like a number or date? Why do the devs bomb the whole thing with this change without thinking how to define the actual state of the project. How can other projects work together without revision numbers or similar things. This sucks so much i´m really pi**** off :mad: We really have nothing else to do the whole day to change everything that was used to be working so well for years now.

I use three diffrent linux distibutions here and it´s partually a pain in the a** to make GIT properly run with my scripts and then you compile the stuff and don´t have a rev number to coordinate with sd2/udb, etc, also installed by smart scripts, but fu*** by stupid GIT. :mad: Without a fix rev/nunmber i can draw my scripts into the bin.