raftom
Members-
Posts
24 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Donations
0.00 GBP
Content Type
Profiles
Bug Tracker
Wiki
Release Notes
Forums
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Everything posted by raftom
-
i kinda couldn't find anything that looks like 40% for spell http://www.wowhead.com/spell=12848 rank 1 and 5 have also value:1 with applyaura: dummy in effect box (no idea if it's important or not) anyway... this fix is wondering on forum for such a long time, it 'd be nice if sb actually apply this
-
DELETE FROM `spell_bonus_data` WHERE `entry` = 116; INSERT INTO `spell_bonus_data` (`entry`, `direct_bonus`, `dot_bonus`, `ap_bonus`, `comments`) VALUES ('116','0.8550','0','0', 'Mage - Frost Bolt'); spell power coeff is for patch 3.3.0. this one above is new bonus for patch 3.3.3 (5% increased spell power coeff) http://www.wowhead.com/patchnotes=3.3.3
-
[10327][BUG] Argent Crusade Commendation Badge, spell 61311
raftom replied to a topic in OldBug reports
what about the 2nd effect of for example http://www.wowhead.com/spell=61311? is it somehow connected to this 30% extra reputation? -
it fixes a bug that teams with rating below 1500 dont gets points as if they where at 1500 rating http://www.wowwiki.com/Season_6 here is small info diff --git a/ArenaTeam.cpp b/ArenaTeam2.cpp index ed4ce5b..4d413d6 100644 --- a/ArenaTeam.cpp +++ b/ArenaTeam2.cpp @@ -523,7 +523,10 @@ uint32 ArenaTeam::GetPoints(uint32 MemberRating) float points; uint32 rating = MemberRating + 150 < m_stats.rating ? MemberRating : m_stats.rating; - + + if (sWorld.getConfig(CONFIG_UINT32_ARENA_SEASON_ID) >= 6 && rating <= 1500) + rating = 1500; + if(rating <= 1500) points = (float)rating * 0.22f + 14.0f; else also try checking arena calculators for more info plz test and share comments
-
maybe it should be written in the same way as warrior's overpower ?
-
[patch] Don't heal caster again and again when he's reached max health
raftom replied to daveh's topic in ... under reviewOld
and i wonder why is that ... since hots still heal at your max health, and your max heath isnt increasing, the condition (target->health>=target->maxhealth) must be checked somewhere to prevent adding excess health :confused: -
warbringer uses both 262 and 275 abilities using aura 262 http://thottbot.com/?e=Apply%20Aura%20262
-
i believe this kind of implementation was already put on forum ... dont know why wasn't add to git anyway thx
-
well to me rune strike should be implemented similar to warrior's overpower... check Unit::ProcDamageAndSpellFor() for REACTIVE_OVERPOWER
-
i rewrite the patch using suggestions posted by lightguard... i hope it will not crash now
-
[patch][8340] Torment the weak - dmg calculation
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
hmm i dont think ttw affects frostbolt but it should -
hmmm i found this (divine purpose) AuraMap& Auras = pVictim->GetAuras(); for(AuraMap::const_iterator iter = Auras.begin(); iter != Auras.end() { SpellEntry const *spell = iter->second->GetSpellProto(); if( spell->Mechanic == MECHANIC_STUN || spell->EffectMechanic[iter->second->GetEffIndex()] == MECHANIC_STUN) { pVictim->RemoveAurasDueToSpell(spell->Id); iter = Auras.begin(); } else ++iter; } is this a better way to write haste part of the glyph?
-
i edited first post... now it's in correct spellfamilyname case and i added remove only negative spell haste aura plz test and share comments:)
-
[possible fix ver. 2][8239]Shattered Barrier
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
finally thx guys -
[possible fix ver. 2][8239]Shattered Barrier
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
now let devs look at this thread and get their opinion about patches -
[possible fix ver. 2][8239]Shattered Barrier
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
so anybody tested ? anyone has any ideas about it? -
[possible fix ver. 2][8239]Shattered Barrier
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
dont thank me ... thank passdVn i just took his idea from rapture patch (8064 rev) edit: anybody tested it ? -
What bug does the patch fix? What features does the patch add? haste part for talent borrowed time For which repository revision was the patch created? 7643 Is there a thread in the bug report section or at lighthouse? If yes, please add a link to the thread. didn't find any Who has been writing this patch? Please include either forum user names or email addresses. that would be me diff --git a/Unit.cpp b/Unit2.cpp index c8f19e0..11ca352 100644 --- a/Unit.cpp +++ b/Unit2.cpp @@ -6343,6 +6343,22 @@ bool Unit::HandleProcTriggerSpell(Unit *pVictim, uint32 damage, Aura* triggeredB basepoints0 = damage * triggerAmount / 100 / 3; target = this; } + //borrowed time - haste + else if (auraSpellInfo->SpellIconID == 2899) + { + switch (auraSpellInfo->Id) + { + case 52795: trigger_spell_id = 59887; break; + case 52797: trigger_spell_id = 59888; break; + case 52798: trigger_spell_id = 59889; break; + case 52799: trigger_spell_id = 59890; break; + case 52800: trigger_spell_id = 59891; break; + default: + sLog.outError("Unit::HandleProcTriggerSpell: Spell %u not handled in Borrowed time", auraSpellInfo->Id); + return false; + } + target = pVictim; + } break; } case SPELLFAMILY_DRUID: edit: it already worked sry .. i didnt noticed
-
[fix] Ice barrier spell power coef patch 3.0.2
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
the only entries i was able to find from wowhead and spell.dbc were these below and 33245 (used by some mobs) DELETE FROM `spell_bonus_data` WHERE `entry` IN ('11426','13031','13032','13033','27134','33405','43038','43039'); INSERT INTO `spell_bonus_data` (`entry`, `direct_bonus`, `dot_bonus`, `ap_bonus`, `comments`) VALUES ('11426', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 1)'), ('13031', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 2)'), ('13032', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 3)'), ('13033', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 4)'), ('27134', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 5)'), ('33405', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 6)'), ('43038', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 7)'), ('43039', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 8)'); that hardcoded values was on purpose i believe ... just read the comment (to prevent double apply bonus) -
well i think i should be written in void Aura::HandleAddModifier(bool apply, bool Real) ... http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=31683 just read the effects
-
[fix] Ice barrier spell power coef patch 3.0.2
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
lol i forgot bracers {} .... corrected first post and it should works now -
[fix] Ice barrier spell power coef patch 3.0.2
raftom replied to Auntie Mangos's topic in ... acceptedOld
any news ?? anybody tested?? -
on our realm we have rev 7577 and we still have this bug ... i don't know why i noticed today that after using deathchill, killing machine buff ends as it should
-
I have one question about Ice Barrier... it doesnt seem to get 80% bonus from spell power http://www.wowwiki.com/Spell_power_coefficient so i thought it might help DELETE FROM `spell_bonus_data` WHERE `entry` IN ('11426','13031','13032','13033','27134','33405','43038','43039'); INSERT INTO `spell_bonus_data` (`entry`, `direct_bonus`, `dot_bonus`, `ap_bonus`, `comments`) VALUES ('11426', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 1)'), ('13031', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 2)'), ('13032', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 3)'), ('13033', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 4)'), ('27134', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 5)'), ('33405', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 6)'), ('43038', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 7)'), ('43039', '0.8053', '0', '0', 'Mage - Ice Barrier(Rank 8)'); if sth is wrong with entries plz correct it
Contact Us
To contact us
click here
You can also email us at [email protected]
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
You can also email us at [email protected]
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © getMaNGOS. All rights Reserved.
This website is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®
This website is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®