Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Remind me a lot of original WoW... maybe blizzard decided to make a loop : Dragon->Rogue Elf -> Scourge -> Dragon and so on .... that ould be sad but regarding at how they handle SC2 i sadly believe Blizz fall to capitalism....

Posted

Windows 7 (x64) here. I have had issues using the beta on a shared drive, where both Windows and Linux access files, cause Linux seems to break the folder status for Windows 7.

Posted

It will be possible mangos to emulate 4.x.x patch ? in TC says that they can't emulate it because for this opcode or whatever is it :(

[vladimir: because they can't copy from mangos support changes as do for _each_ prev. client switches]

Posted

Patience, please. Patch 4.x does include quite a few changes which require changes to mangos. Unless you see the git branch 400 coming back into the master branch, there will be no patch 4.x support available.

Posted

There is one thing about TC which I really like: they have succeeded in creating a CMake build system, and they seem to have fixed rules for commit message style.

Other than that I recently discovered their very, very "friendly" attitude :P

Posted

cipherCOM do cmake support for mangos. This for mangos-0.12 but it not dependent in anything really from branch.

http://github.com/cipherCOM/mangos/commits/cmake-0.12

We active discuss it's problems and possible improvements last weeks and he make good progress.

Currently for me know 2 problem that need resolve for good work:

1) at build part ACE/TBB always relinking that slowdown development rebuilds

2) impossible start debug from IDB. dlls copied to finaly bin directory only at install project run

but at ide start used binaries in non-installed locations with missing libs path. So or must befixed lib paths into original locations

or bin dir must considered as built targed instead install target dir.

Both mostly affect development and existed cmake must fine work for endusers

Posted
a good database for cata?

Seriously, it seems like some people want a private cataclysm server before the real one is out. Wtf ?!

Stop asking for cataclysm support all the time, the official release date is december 7th (for my country), what do you think devs can do ? Yes, they're good, but I really doubt they can achieve before Blizzard what Blizzard is developing at this moment.

It's like asking for a pirated software before the real one is out.

Sorry if I'm rude....but sometimes I feel like I have to be so that people understand.

Posted
[vladimir: because they can't copy from mangos support changes as do for _each_ prev. client switches]

Vladimir, I used to have lot's of respect for you back in the days. But man seriously? They give proper credits and everything I don't see where the problem is. Isn't that the whole point of open source? Grow up, please...

And yes, I know I am probably going to get banned for this post because this is how mangos staff usually deals with problems.

Just my two cents.

Posted

We assume that by registering an account you accept the rules presented before you can register.

Those rules do state that we just ban, and not warn. We make exceptions if we feel someone has had a bad day, because everyone has those. We always try to be friendly, and not violate our own rules.

Probably people have not noticed but the staff follows the code of conduct, too.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use