nanounico

ok, and later git pull from locale? EDIT: Any test this? is stable?

i dont understand ambal, so what is the problem? EDIT: Do you know how i can see if the mtmaps are working fine?

yes, but in this, is necessary configure for work fine, if you use, git pull git://git.assembla.com/multimangos.git dont work.!

I use, and works fine for me.. ^^ only i have this problems some times. i dont know what is this.

derex, really god work, but, i ask, why dont put in a git?

is for mangos! =P

i think this is the realm problem, for all problems with latency actually, i remember, when in 0.12 this problems present, and the lagg after 500 are very bad. later fix this for and all problems with the latency over.

well, now i test in my server without this patch, becouse this patch turn a little unstable my server!

this is best than relocation and visibility from mangos.ru? thanks really man, very plus for you jeje (Testing)

yes, i'm testing, about 1 hour ON right now. working fine. REV 8133 ScriptDev2 Acid, Centos 5.3 x86 thanks Infinity

well, i compile with gcc-4.1.2-44 x86_64, and aparently everything if ok. i try find something for upgrade my gcc, but i cant find nothing, i have Centos 5.3

ok, thanks men

thank you very much!! you are the best men!! one last question, i need turn off vmaps?

thanks wowka for your time, and help. i use your command and say this is possible that i remove the part for win? and the patch work fine? i use linux.

but my problem is when i try apply the *.patch "Space before tab in indent" How fix this?

but is for trinity!, i try compile with rev 8118 and dont work. very Sad!

so, for, 1500+ testers, and 2x intel xeon 5430, what would be the best configuration?

Well. if some body have mtmaps working, for the latest rev (+ 8118), i'm really need. and i think help a lot of people in mangos. Cordially Nano Thanks

Testing this patch!

painejake, can you help me, i send to you pm. please or somebody, because i cant find a newest mtmaps, with the latest rev, any work.

testing with the latest rev. 7928 ^^

I put char buf [1024]; and again Other more

Core: 7924 SD2: 1110 UDB: 380 ACID: 29

571 is necessary ?? why? i have 3.0.9

.item remove ID i think this is a good idea.. Salu2