Jump to content

MoveMaps


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the thing i was wondering about is if this tile limit is all tiles, or just tiles loaded into navmesh at some point. if its just the number of tiles that can be loaded at once, we can add more poligons per tile, just making sure we do not load to many tiles at once.

Detour creates the maximum number of tiles possible right from the start (in dtNavMesh::init)

It then uses those blank tiles as a pool, and that pool behaves like a stack backed by m_tiles[m_maxTiles]

m_nextFree is the stack pointer.

when you add a tile, Detour pops the stack and uses that tile

when you remove a tile, Detour clears the data in it, then pushes it on top of the stack

So we aren't dealing with a dynamic number of tiles. We're stuck with the 12bit tileID if we use 4096 tiles, unless we re-write all of the code that uses salt. Do we really need 10bits for salt? (question in the back of my mind is do we really need salt at all?)

edit: I don't think it would be a major re-write to reduce salt to 5 bits or something. Maybe just change one line in init!

And even if we didn't have these limitations, I'm sure there would be problems with not being able to load all tiles simultaneously.

Grids staying in memory permanently because of mangosd.conf GridUnload = 0

People may even have a lot of ram and prefer to pre-load all grids + tiles, as in -New-Map-Terrain-Management-System"][Map/Grid] New Map/Terrain Management System

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 38 years later...

Hi,

This is the current work on the mmaps project, which aimed to add pathfinding to mangos. If somebody wants to code it.

Me and Neo2003 took the code and fixed the all the bugs we found, ported it to autotools build. Made it perfectly generate all surfaces around the "world".

http://filebeam.com/a9d136a33168f6c1621535cc96beb993

What needs to be done is:

* There is missing a reliable way of finding out what are the points around a certain point.

* The actual logic of which paths will be finded is missing.

If somebody is interested in continuing the project I pls contact me for better explanation of the sources.

Screens (by Neo2003)

03zz7.th.pngthpix.gif

04am7.th.pngthpix.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

05iy7.th.png

06vl3.th.png

07xu7.th.png

08sf0.th.png

The red dots are the mmaps dots. The white lines that form the surface are made by navmeshgenerator. The blue is vmaps.

PS: The forum alows 4 images per post.

[EDIT] Looks like somebody hacked imageshack, I wont remove the pics in case they recover from backup or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A* on the fly ... which means very slow and a lot of memory usage.

But inplementing accurate navmesh for all this surface maybe very complicated and may be not that accurate.

I know a guy who is using a navmesh for his bot platform and its highly accurate. So it is very possible to get accurate navemesh generation. Also, resource usage wouldn't be overly high as long as the algorithm is implemented correctly and you're not constantly calculating huuuge paths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dboubt anyone can handle this patch and even if they can they either don't have the time, or mood to get into it.

Derex is there any way the we, the unexperienced progammers can help ?, maybe even do some chores around your house to save you some time (<<kidding) but seriously, this is very important to me, i will help in any way i can, just telll me how.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use