Jump to content

VladimirMangos

Members
  • Posts

    2813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Donations

    0.00 GBP 

Everything posted by VladimirMangos

  1. Main problem with 2 iteration item equipping and special bag sorting. second iteration search only main bag and then if for example arrows in not main bag and added before special bag equipping then its will not moved to special bag at second iteration.
  2. Spell need in code support for classify spell targets as enemies only. Also 0x20000 not good flag for event. Its not triggred for polymorph for example, but from comments known at it _must_ work at this spell cast. Patch with this changes in [6540]. Thank you
  3. UNIT_FIELD_OFFHANDATTACKTIME is unofficial name of field (UNIT_FIELD_BASEATTACKTIME+1)
  4. Just add to this: changing ItemExtendedCost.dbc will change price in _all_ items that use same special prices id in this dbc. For changing appropriate special price (linitation: from existed in dbc cases) for specific item you need find appropriate data in dbc and use id in `npc_vendor`.`ExtendedCost`. Also note that different vendors can have different special prices. This is used for sell item for different money types, for example.
  5. I not see reason why we need add different account levels for players. So current enum clear: all non player account is GM account.
  6. Just search for SEC_PLAYER and SEC_MODERATOR in sources in conditions
  7. In [6521] + 10secs cooldown. Thank you Please follow pointed patch suggesting guide next time.
  8. Yes, agree, in progress [added]Command implemented in [6513]
  9. Patch in [6512]. Thank you Any ideas how implement .cast point command without explicit coordinates ? Maybe distance?
  10. With some changes patch added in [6508]. Thank you
  11. Patch in [6503]. Thank you I remove error output for this case.
  12. Patch attempt fix problem in hack way. original caster _correctly_ used for selection as expected for this functions. If something not work correctly then SPELL_TARGETS_* value pprovided for _this_ specific target modes combination incorretly. Correct way: implementing step by step 2-step targeting scheme with ImplicitTargetA provide data for ImplicitTargetB targeting. Work in this implementation only in beggining
  13. Added in [6491]. Thank you Ops.... sorry, i forgot add your nick name to commit notes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use