bulek

bump any proges?

with 8799 works fine

mangos devs plz review this core patch

bump? any news

bump?:mellow:

sry my fail , fix is correct

diff --git a/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp b/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp

index 6948cbd..a6bb18e 100644

--- a/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp

+++ b/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp

@@ -2456,7 +2456,18 @@ void Aura::HandleAuraDummy(bool apply, bool Real)

break;

}

case SPELLFAMILY_MAGE:

+ {

+ // Living Bomb

+ if (m_spellProto->SpellIconID == 3000 && (m_spellProto->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x2000000000000)))

+ {

+ // Zero duration is equal to AURA_REMOVE_BY_DEFAULT. We can't use it directly, as it is set even

+ // when removing aura from one target due to casting Living Bomb at other.

+ if (caster && !apply && (m_duration == 0 || m_removeMode == AURA_REMOVE_BY_DISPEL))

+ caster->CastSpell(m_target,m_modifier.m_amount,true);

+ return;

+ }

break;

+ }

case SPELLFAMILY_PRIEST:

{

// Pain and Suffering

diff --git a/src/game/SpellMgr.cpp b/src/game/SpellMgr.cpp

index fa0cff1..a20a310 100644

--- a/src/game/SpellMgr.cpp

+++ b/src/game/SpellMgr.cpp

@@ -186,6 +186,9 @@ SpellSpecific GetSpellSpecific(uint32 spellId)

if ((spellInfo->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x1000000)) && spellInfo->EffectApplyAuraName[0]==SPELL_AURA_MOD_CONFUSE)

return SPELL_MAGE_POLYMORPH;

+ if (spellInfo->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x2000000000000))

+ return SPELL_MAGE_BOMB;

+

break;

}

case SPELLFAMILY_WARRIOR:

@@ -288,6 +291,7 @@ bool IsSingleFromSpellSpecificPerTargetPerCaster(SpellSpecific spellSpec1,SpellS

case SPELL_POSITIVE_SHOUT:

case SPELL_JUDGEMENT:

case SPELL_HAND:

+ case SPELL_MAGE_BOMB:

return spellSpec1==spellSpec2;

default:

return false;

@@ -303,6 +307,7 @@ bool IsSingleFromSpellSpecificSpellRanksPerTarget(SpellSpecific spellSpec1,Spell

case SPELL_AURA:

case SPELL_CURSE:

case SPELL_HAND:

+ case SPELL_MAGE_BOMB:

return spellSpec1==spellSpec2;

default:

return false;

@@ -1369,6 +1374,11 @@ bool SpellMgr::IsNoStackSpellDueToSpell(uint32 spellId_1, uint32 spellId_2) cons

case SPELLFAMILY_MAGE:

if( spellInfo_2->SpellFamilyName == SPELLFAMILY_MAGE )

{

+ // Living Bomb & Ignite

+ if( (spellInfo_1->SpellIconID == 3000) && (spellInfo_2->SpellIconID == 937) ||

+ (spellInfo_2->SpellIconID == 3000) && (spellInfo_1->SpellIconID == 937) )

+ return false;

+

// Blizzard & Chilled (and some other stacked with blizzard spells

if( (spellInfo_1->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x80)) && (spellInfo_2->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x100000)) ||

(spellInfo_2->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x80)) && (spellInfo_1->SpellFamilyFlags & UI64LIT(0x100000)) )

diff --git a/src/game/SpellMgr.h b/src/game/SpellMgr.h

index 236a7f8..298ac81 100644

--- a/src/game/SpellMgr.h

+++ b/src/game/SpellMgr.h

@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ enum SpellSpecific

SPELL_FOOD = 20,

SPELL_DRINK = 21,

SPELL_FOOD_AND_DRINK = 22,

+ SPELL_MAGE_BOMB = 23,

};

SpellSpecific GetSpellSpecific(uint32 spellId);

yeah this patch is nice mangos devs please review this patch

http://www.wowwiki.com/Patch_3.2.0

  Shaman
   * Base health increased by approximately 7% to correct for shamans having lower health than other classes. 

I have tried this sql and it works:

UPDATE `player_classlevelstats` SET `basehp`= `basehp` * 1.07 WHERE class = 7;

I use YTDB R51 and mangos 8781.

Your fix works only for new characters are created with the player but not for the old are already level 80:(

oh pls dev review this patch testet on last revision and working nicely done:huh:

kung fu bump this patch is correct

BUMP this patch is great , Developers plz review this patch:o:)

bump, patch working correct:)

devs plz review this patch )

:)devs review this patch please working corectly^_^

Are you serious? The fact that db data are used only for "normal" spell damage and not spell specific (judgement is holy isn't it?) would render the table useless for most spells

KAPATEJIb the truth:)

test result=well done! great patch, works for me

well done thank you

oh nice patch mangos dev review plz :cool::huh:

diff --git a/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp b/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp
index ff6d791..a25b38d 100644
--- a/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp
+++ b/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp
@@ -1011,13 +1011,18 @@ void Aura::_AddAura()
        }
    }

-    if (IsNeedVisibleSlot(caster))
+    // Test hack of set slot and aura update of Warbringer and Juggernaut 
+    if (IsNeedVisibleSlot(caster) || ((m_spellProto->Id == 57499 || m_spellProto->Id == 64976) && m_spellProto->EffectApplyAuraName[GetEffIndex()] == SPELL_AURA_262))
    {
        SetAuraSlot( slot );
        if(slot < MAX_AURAS)                        // slot found send data to client
        {
            SetAura(false);
-            SetAuraFlags((1 << GetEffIndex()) | AFLAG_NOT_CASTER | ((GetAuraMaxDuration() > 0) ? AFLAG_DURATION : AFLAG_NONE) | (IsPositive() ? AFLAG_POSITIVE : AFLAG_NEGATIVE));
+            // Send new auraFlags 
+            if ((m_spellProto->Id == 57499 || m_spellProto->Id == 64976) && m_spellProto->EffectApplyAuraName[GetEffIndex()] == SPELL_AURA_262) 
+                SetAuraFlags((7) | AFLAG_NOT_CASTER | ((GetAuraMaxDuration() > 0) ? AFLAG_DURATION : AFLAG_NONE) | (IsPositive() ? AFLAG_POSITIVE : AFLAG_NEGATIVE)); 
+            else 
+                SetAuraFlags((1 << GetEffIndex()) | AFLAG_NOT_CASTER | ((GetAuraMaxDuration() > 0) ? AFLAG_DURATION : AFLAG_NONE) | (IsPositive() ? AFLAG_POSITIVE : AFLAG_NEGATIVE));
            SetAuraLevel(caster ? caster->getLevel() : sWorld.getConfig(CONFIG_MAX_PLAYER_LEVEL));
            SendAuraUpdate(false);
        }

Author: MaS0n from getmangos.ru

work for me:)

bump,

patch work for me pls add to svn:)

any news guys:confused:

this works for me:

diff --git a/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp b/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp
index 582946a..e962486 100644
--- a/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp
+++ b/src/game/SpellAuras.cpp
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ pAuraHandler AuraHandler[TOTAL_AURAS]=
    &Aura::HandleNoImmediateEffect,                         //203 SPELL_AURA_MOD_ATTACKER_MELEE_CRIT_DAMAGE  implemented in Unit::CalculateMeleeDamage and Unit::SpellCriticalDamageBonus
    &Aura::HandleNoImmediateEffect,                         //204 SPELL_AURA_MOD_ATTACKER_RANGED_CRIT_DAMAGE implemented in Unit::CalculateMeleeDamage and Unit::SpellCriticalDamageBonus
    &Aura::HandleNoImmediateEffect,                         //205 SPELL_AURA_MOD_ATTACKER_SPELL_CRIT_DAMAGE  implemented in Unit::SpellCriticalDamageBonus
-    &Aura::HandleNULL,                                      //206 SPELL_AURA_MOD_SPEED_MOUNTED
+    &Aura::HandleAuraModIncreaseFlightSpeed,                //206 SPELL_AURA_MOD_SPEED_MOUNTED
    &Aura::HandleAuraModIncreaseFlightSpeed,                //207 SPELL_AURA_MOD_INCREASE_FLIGHT_SPEED
    &Aura::HandleAuraModIncreaseFlightSpeed,                //208 SPELL_AURA_MOD_SPEED_FLIGHT, used only in spell: Flight Form (Passive)
    &Aura::HandleAuraModIncreaseFlightSpeed,                //209 SPELL_AURA_MOD_FLIGHT_SPEED_ALWAYS
diff --git a/src/game/Unit.cpp b/src/game/Unit.cpp
index a282c96..b06868d 100644
--- a/src/game/Unit.cpp
+++ b/src/game/Unit.cpp
@@ -10023,7 +10023,7 @@ void Unit::UpdateSpeed(UnitMoveType mtype, bool forced)
            if (IsMounted()) // Use on mount auras
                main_speed_mod  = GetMaxPositiveAuraModifier(SPELL_AURA_MOD_INCREASE_FLIGHT_SPEED);
            else             // Use not mount (shapeshift for example) auras (should stack)
-                main_speed_mod  = GetTotalAuraModifier(SPELL_AURA_MOD_SPEED_FLIGHT);
+                main_speed_mod  = GetTotalAuraModifier(SPELL_AURA_MOD_SPEED_MOUNTED);
            stack_bonus     = GetTotalAuraMultiplier(SPELL_AURA_MOD_FLIGHT_SPEED_ALWAYS);
            non_stack_bonus = (100.0 + GetMaxPositiveAuraModifier(SPELL_AURA_MOD_FLIGHT_SPEED_NOT_STACK))/100.0f;
            break;

BUMP!

this patch work for me

ok, and this patch works correct?

diff -- git a / src / game / SpellAuras . cpp b / src / game / SpellAuras . cpp
index 3a0862d . .0d28cb8 100644
--- a / src / game / SpellAuras . cpp
+++ b / src / game / SpellAuras . cpp
@@ - 2637 , 6 + 2637 , 9 @@ void Aura :: HandleAuraModShapeshift ( bool apply , bool Real )
case FORM_SHADOW :
case FORM_STEALTH :
break;
+        case FORM_SHADOWDANCE :
+ PowerType = POWER_ENERGY ;
+            break;
case FORM_TREE :
modelid = 864 ;
break;
@@ - 2682 , 7 + 2685 , 8 @@ void Aura :: HandleAuraModShapeshift ( bool apply , bool Real )
if( m_target -> m_ShapeShiftFormSpellId )
m_target -> RemoveAurasDueToSpell ( m_target -> m_ShapeShiftFormSpellId , this );

- m_target -> SetByteValue ( UNIT_FIELD_BYTES_2 , 3 , form );
+ // For Shadow Dance we must apply Stealth form (30) instead of current (13)
+ m_target -> SetByteValue ( UNIT_FIELD_BYTES_2 , 3 , ( form == FORM_SHADOWDANCE ) ? uint8 ( FORM_STEALTH ) : form );

if( modelid > 0 )
m_target -> SetDisplayId ( modelid );
@@ - 2747 , 6 + 2751 , 10 @@ void Aura :: HandleAuraModShapeshift ( bool apply , bool Real )
m_target -> SetPower ( POWER_RAGE , Rage_val );
break;
}
+ // Shadow Dance - apply stealth mode stand flag
+                case FORM_SHADOWDANCE :
+ m_target -> SetStandFlags ( UNIT_STAND_FLAGS_CREEP );
+                    break;
default:
break;
}
@@ - 2779 , 6 + 2787 , 10 @@ void Aura :: HandleAuraModShapeshift ( bool apply , bool Real )
if( Aura * dummy = m_target -> GetDummyAura ( 37324 ) )
m_target -> CastSpell ( m_target , 37325 , true , NULL , dummy );
break;
+ // Shadow Dance - remove stealth mode stand flag
+            case FORM_SHADOWDANCE :
+ m_target -> RemoveStandFlags ( UNIT_STAND_FLAGS_CREEP );
+                break;
default:
break;
}
diff -- git a / src / game / Unit . h b / src / game / Unit . h
index faefbef . .3f0e578 100644
--- a / src / game / Unit . h
+++ b / src / game / Unit . h
@@ - 167 , 6 + 167 , 7 @@ enum ShapeshiftForm
FORM_GHOUL = 0x07 ,
FORM_DIREBEAR = 0x08 ,
FORM_CREATUREBEAR = 0x0E ,
+ FORM_SHADOWDANCE = 0x0D ,
FORM_CREATURECAT = 0x0F ,
FORM_GHOSTWOLF = 0x10 ,
FORM_BATTLESTANCE = 0x11 ,

bump this patch work on 8742

sry for bumping but this patch is intersing:mellow:

Please developers to add the patch to revision according to the test :-) works correctly;)]

my testers know method how to "win" roll without having highet roll. It is matter of propper key combination in exact time. I don't know how to do this but if you want I can ask (or perform interrogation )

hmm interesting ... bite, therefore, ask your testers but I doubt that this is possible can capture packet ....:huh: