Jump to content

Auntie Mangos

Moderators
  • Posts

    2446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Donations

    0.00 GBP 

Everything posted by Auntie Mangos

  1. hehe =) i know you can't post them all how can i extract them myself. i found a program Spell Work http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=13617 and i think it would be one of the solutions. (i managed to extract them through that program but i'm having trouble with some filters, but i'll manage, i guess)
  2. Read the previous posts next time before asking again (don't be lazy!) http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?13676-Patch-Auction-House-Bot-%28Xeross-Branch%29&p=117837&viewfull=1#post117837
  3. http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=5351 go to the third step
  4. You posted in the wrong section hopefully an mod will move it to the "Database" section (http://getmangos.eu/community/viewforum.php?id=10) don't repost just ask them to move it.
  5. Cypherjb yea seems you are smart, but cluster comes transparently with multiprocess version simply because we can use CORBA for IPC. CORBA is not the thing it was some years before, current CORBA implementations got realy advanced.
  6. There are other guides like this one http://getmangos.eu/community/topic/5351/guide-updating-for-windows/ , it is for windows, but it avowed very good the file name and database structure, whith it you should unterstand how to update the database.
  7. http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?13121-World-of-Warcraft-Server-for-Windows-Installation-Guide&p=110300&viewfull=1#post110300 mystery solved any1 who is having problems and spendt some time reading here.. I'd definatly recommend the other tutorial. double check everything b4 u do anything and read the whole step and understand it and u are on ur way to make a faultless server http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?13121-World-of-Warcraft-Server-for-Windows-Installation-Guide
  8. What bug does the patch fix? What features does the patch add? fix procFlag flag of its spell (http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=61356) For which repository revision was the patch created? 9112 Is there a thread in the bug report section or at lighthouse? If yes, please add a link to the thread. http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?11868-Meta-Gem-not-healing Who has been writing this patch? Please include either forum user names or email addresses. Me -- (61356) Invigorating Earthsiege Diamond Passive () DELETE FROM `spell_proc_event` WHERE `entry` IN (61356); INSERT INTO `spell_proc_event` VALUES (61356, 0x00, 0, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00014154, 0x00000002, 0.000000, 0.000000, 45);
  9. Now in right forum part Mangos Version: 10500+ Custom Patches: many, but nothing with pets SD2 Version: How it SHOULD work: If a player teleport into BG, Arena, instance or anywhere, your pet should have a name. How it DOES work: If a player teleport into BG, Arena, instance or anywhere, your pet has NO name. The pet is unknow. After a WoW restart the pet has a name. A huge bug with this problem is, that the fightlog also will be buggy, because the pet has no name^^ In this forum part some thoughts. http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=14049 Thanks for your work to fix this bug
  10. Description of the feature? Allows to despawn Type-5 GOs with Use For which repository revision was the patch created? 10409 Is there a thread in the bug report section or at lighthouse? no Who has been writing this patch? me In some rare cases we need to despawn Generic-Type GOs. this should be done with GO::Use However there is one very big problem: There is no pattern which GO can be despawned, and which cannot, so there are only (at least without entirely new information) possibilities to get it done: 1) Allow despawning for all GOs 2) Allow despawning only for some entries Further Research Information: http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=14368 - this only shows that "in the wild" only the Beacon torch is used (which is due to crap in the DBs) and hence we have a high chance that there is no unwanted side effect of allowing general despawn. A few GOs: ** GOs that shall despawn: 179511, 179563, 183771, 190094(maybe UpdateEntry) ** GOs that shall not despawn: Don't know any type-5 GO, that is "Used" but shouldn't despawn.. ** 176093 and 190094 have both data1=1, the rest of the GOs is all 0 => no information possible Patch: http://paste2.org/p/965633 (includes unifying comment style for the GO-type numbers) the "heart" of this big patch is: + case GAMEOBJECT_TYPE_GENERIC: // 5 + { + // Generic GO despawn - only good different approach is to slect despawnable GOs by Entry + SetLootState(GO_JUST_DEACTIVATED); + return; + } In case you prefered a strict check: http://paste2.org/p/965639 (though I think the general despawn possibility won't give any problems) Edit: Remove notes regarding beacon torch, was mistake in DBs..
  11. Totems are not GO, they're units This problem has already been discussed, see http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=14795 for more info
  12. confirmed (btw nice picture ) anyway related to -spell-target-type-77"]http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?8653-[fix]-spell-target-type-77 and Penance"]http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?10949-[exploit]Penance
  13. waza123, as i see, you use hack with durability. That and will be. If you wanna fix it more correct(but still hackly) Use this. Place before IsBroken - > return Or like zhenya said.
  14. Well I think the main idea was to get the code working for the actual tabards. The db info is mostly the concern of the DB teams. PSDB for example is ready for it, and I'm happy to be testing this. Working great so far with the change on Post# 26 or # 27.
  15. What bug does the patch fix? What features does the patch add? Let damage break spell 51514 and similar effects, as expected. For which repository revision was the patch created? 7795+ Is there a thread in the bug report section or at lighthouse? If yes, please add a link to the thread. http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=7833 Who has been writing this patch? Me http://github.com/dragonshard/mangos/commit/fec673c38f4888c64170cabe96dbd7f6523838d9 Note: This patch also fix the bug (no idea if it was report, sorry) that some transform auras were removed if you take damage when you're confused by a 3rd part spell. Example: Use Orb of Deception, cast on youself spells like blind or similar, and take damage. Yuo're instantly demorphed. @Devs: One more thing. It's right that at level 80 (watching at the formulas in Unit::RemoveSpellbyDamageTaken) you have to do only 1850+ damage to break a spell effect or it should be reviewed?
  16. Could your problem be any dll for MySQL connection on Win ? You installed the MySQL for Win32 ? And did the Mangos build for Win32 also ? Edit: -- you got it, ok. The command is "ACCOUNT CREATE %usr% %pass%" right ? Get the Minimanager, its a great tool. (you will need a webserver and a PHP sapi)
  17. Hi, I had the same problem (and yea, its not a good search engine) http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=27035 Its fixed in the 6164 SQL revision thanks to Vladimir
  18. Thank you for reporting. Already reported and fixed, see http://getmangos.eu/community/topic/17424/fixedproblem-with-newest-core/
  19. take a look into this http://getmangos.eu/community/topic/17015/movemaps/
  20. Added quick fix in [s1338]. Need to backport [7125] for it to work properly due to the following reason: http://getmangos.eu/community/post/137418/#p137418 Thanks
  21. http://getmangos.eu/community/topic/16201/something-new-about-cataclysm/
  22. take a look at this thread: we worked through a bunch of problems, and it might help you out. http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=14964&page=1 also, the Mac OS X compilation entry in the wiki's been updated, and might be of service http://getmangos.eu/wiki/Compile_MaNGOS_On_Mac_OS_X
  23. Attempt use second patch in thread: http://getmangos.eu/community/showthread.php?12148-[9219][patch]-Allow-configure-to-find-OpenSSL-if-pkg-config-fails&p=100755#post100755 and please report is this resolve porblem.
  24. Crash in Player::_SaveInventory http://getmangos.eu/community/viewtopic.php?id=11692
  25. yes, but this is not compatible with new revision in patch apliing shows errors
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use