X-Savior

This fix also needs to be backported to Mangos One. I am VERY Surprised this has not been added to Master yet. Someone please Submit for review this fix please.

Yes, UDB is still active (forum is slow but dev team is hard at work) so I highly suggest bringing up this issue so it can be fixed in UDB 404.

Ok, confirmed this fixed it. I made the changes manually to my source but it DOES compile now properly Now we just need someone to commit to repo. Thank You!

Mangos 11928 VC90 x64 Build (Fresh Repo) 12>LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'Detour.lib' 12>mangosd - 1 error(s), 8 warning(s) ========== Rebuild All: 11 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 skipped ========== I noticed a folder in "win" called x64 is created with a "Release" folder and file "Detour.lib" located in it. I suspect compile is saving this file to wrong location and not in the proper "bin/x64_Release" folder.

This is DB project issue. I suggest bringing this issue to UDB forums if you are using UDB.

Schmoo has discovered problem (very simple typo) in Player.cpp causing problem. hopefully should be committed soon. (FYI: NPC_VENDOR fix is extreme hacky fix and I am disappointed no one bothered to try and look into cause of problem instead of covering it up). Edit by Schmoo: We found a truely beautiful patch, but the margin is too small to copy it here

I have posted about problem in TBC-DB Forums. It looks like Mangos One problem and I am urgently trying to get Mangos Dev's to review this issue. From TBC-DB side everything looks perfect. Very Early on I converted all Grimoire Vendors from NPC_Vendor to NPC_Vendor_Template (As will happen with ALL vendors very soon...like weapons and armor and ect). NPC_Vendor_Template is the next generation Vendor Table system (for those who were unaware). Anyways The items are properly listed in NPC_Vendor_Template and assigned to Vendors properly. But why only ONE Grimoire works to purchase is beyond me. ("Grimoire of Firebolt (Rank 2)") is the only item that works to purchase and all other items gets in-game error message: "The Item Was Not Found"... and this item HAPPENS to be first item listed (May have something to do with it). Here is TBC-DB Forum Topic for this issue as well: http://udb.no-ip.org/index.php/topic,12801.0.html Can Mangos Devs please Look at this as soon as possible as I am holding back TBC-DB 1.2.1 Release until this can be fixed. Thank You!

Sounds Good, in next few days when I get time I will outline a To-Do list of various projects within TBC-DB we would like to achieve. Then if anyone would like to help they are more then welcome to pitch in. (Sorry for the delay... I have had my head in a turtle shell busy working on TBC-DB recently. I am making very good progress but I would appreciate any and all the help I can get). Thanks!

agreed. I have NEVER seen anyone just walk up to a project and say "Hey I am cool so make me a dev cause I fixed things". Best way to get the attention of the other devs is to post fixes and patches, get known and when the time is right and the candidate is ready they will receive an invitation to the dev team.

I always like to have reports and issues brought to light. Feel free to help or even contribute to TBC-DB or ACID as well. I know there are a few people working on core but as it stands I am STILL the ONLY developer behind both ACID and TBC-DB Projects. I would welcome anyone who is serious about joining and helping with the never-ending workload of stuff that needs to be worked on and improved... and yes testers are always very welcome and helpful.

Agreed. You can also look at ScriptDev2 and ACID forums if you are looking to help in Scripting or UDB if you are more interested in Database side.

It would be difficult to get a quality working 4.x when Blizz cant even manage that! :rolleyes: Moving on to 4.x would be like the community having ADD... why cant we just focus on (for the FIRST TIME) completing something? I agree, we have enough on our plates to finish. We have 1.12.1/2.4.3/3.3.5a and NONE of them are perfect yet... so what in the HECK would we take on yet ANOTHER version. If people want to play 4.x go play Blizz! For the rest of the universe who does not want to play it (because it stinks... and I speak from experience) then lets work on Mangos and related projects.

Thank You Vlad!

I would like to try the stable master code. your repo is not up to date with Mangos so I was curious if there was a patch that I can apply to current mangos or if you were going to update your repo so I can compile it and replace my current mangos files to test your playerbot (then if I need to revert I just re-compile original mangos) cause both will be same version. UDB 402 is for Mangos 11792 so it is difficult to use any mangos version less then this.

I could but your format and SQL and ect is different from my format... so I am not what help I can be to your repo...

I am anxious to test this patch out (since we have very low population and need some "help" with our group for Instances). Is there an up to date patch or can the repo be updated for 11792 (Since this is what UDB 402 is at). Thanks!

Hey Everyone, I am not sure if anyone noticed but we have a LONG TIME bug in the auction house. WHen you view items for sale and order by "Rarity" it will sort by page... and this is wrong. What it should do is list by rarity based on ALL items not just what is being displayed on the first page. So an example you should not see green and then white items on the first page and then select second page of items and then get purple and then blue and ect.... those should have been listed on the first page before the green items. This is how Blizz has always operated but Mangos has never been able to parse and sort items from all pages. This goes for any custom search and ect also... anytime it lists anything it should be parsing all items based on rarity.

Ok I understand. it is just as a convenience for people who are not familiar with the normal routine or are looking for a starting point to learn.

What github repository? users should be getting their data from the source repo (TBC-DB Repo).... why would they get the data from some secondary source repo?

yay! I am eagerly awaiting Mangos-One backports. I am already extremely happy to see the AuctionHouseBot and look forward to more.

TBC-DB Update Pack 1.1.1 has now been released. Please visit TBC-DB Forums for details: TBC-DB Updatepack 1.1.1 Release

Thanks!

Well, TBC-DB forums are back up and running again at UDB. I am putting finishing touches on TBC-DB 1.1.1 release so if there is anything to be backported and submitted to TBC-DB please do so as soon as possible. I am happy to include them and make changes as required (as long as info can be provided... I am not going to blind accept anything but as long as info about bug with fix can be provided). I plan to release in less then a week so I would put very high priority on this. Once release is done I will be focusing again on ACID releases for all 3 platforms.

I will continue to Develop the DB and ACID for 2.4.3 as usual... not sure if this counts as helping out? I am looking for a few individuals to help out on the TBC-DB Development team.

I have tried coordinating a merge several years ago... and it was one of the biggest wastes of time I have ever done and ended up dealing with a Mutiny and was handed my hat and a kick in the ass.