Jump to content

Patman128

Members
  • Posts

    1090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Donations

    0.00 GBP 

Everything posted by Patman128

  1. Specifically? There's a few different kinds.
  2. Repacks are not supported here. Mangos for TBC supports 2.4.3, you can find it here: https://github.com/mangos-one/server If you don't want to use it, ask where you got the repack.
  3. Open the problem map in the mmaps viewer (you will have to have debug tiles built with the extractor) and test the part causing trouble. It should be obvious if there is a break in the tiles that needs to be fixed.
  4. AFAIK the problem right now is getting from *the eye has been summoned* to *the player is now possessing it*.
  5. No. Someone makes a converter, some fields get changed, someone makes a new converter, a few more fields get changed, etc, etc.
  6. How about instead of talking about it, someone does something? Things tend to happen when people do things to fix problems.
  7. No, because A. mangos knows how to support Cataclysm, but can't add support because it would involve client hacking, and B. that is a compiled binary, for it to be of any use it would have to include the source code.
  8. You don't. You use the emotes.
  9. I have someone still getting this. See here: http://pretbc.com/viewtopic.php?id=1440 The server is mangos zero.
  10. Most of the queries could also be combined together. For example: DELETE FROM `creature_questrelation` WHERE `quest` IN (999105, 900001, 999102, 999103, 999104, 999025, 999030, 999033, 999034, 999037, 999039, 999040); instead of individual DELETEs. And you can REPLACE multiple rows at the same time.
  11. You probably could have done it as a gossip script instead of quests.
  12. You use Visual Studio? Control-shift-F to search.
  13. From reading the Google translated version of that page, all I know now is "Napomnaet problem of sex in the infrared, where the floor - it Dectructiable Building and in some cases, the player going in the Institute provalilivalsya through the floor.", there was some code on Github that no longer exists, and a broken photo that may or may not have been useful. Is it some sort of new GO model that needs different code to work properly?
  14. You try disabling combat movement in EAI with the EAI command?
  15. Can you post one? I'm interested in it but I'm not really sure what the problem is.
  16. DBC modding is not allowed here. BUT you need to use the DBC on the client and the server.
  17. Yeah, it has to be able to function on the GUID level as well, otherwise it's only usable for a fraction of the possibilities.
  18. If you're using mangos master, it only supports WoW 3.3.5a.
  19. Thanks Schmoo for finally getting in this often overlooked but very prevalent game mechanic into mangos.
  20. World Banker has npcflags 131073, which is 1 (Gossip) + 131072 (Banker). See: http://udbwiki.no-ip.org/index.php/Creature_template#npcflag Bankers are not scripted server-side. When the NPC has the flag set, the client allows the player to view bank info. This is all done client-side. All the server does is respond to bank opcodes (i.e. send bank data to the client when it requests it, see WorldSession::HandleBankerActivateOpcode). The menus can be custom scripted. This can be done via ScriptName for C++ scripts or gossip_menu_id for DB scripts. But it's optional.
  21. I don't believe that has ever been the case. You send patches. If they're good, you're in. For 1.12 you can just send feature branches through to the Github repo.
  22. Specifically...? As do you. What have you contributed exactly? Please stop pointing fingers and realize that until you start learning and helping, you're part of the problem. Not to mention that there are still a ton of mysteries remaining, some of which may never be solved. Here's a forum full: http://pretbc.com/viewforum.php?id=22 It also adds quite a few new mechanics, some of which build on WotLK mechanics which still do not function in mangos master right now. But yeah, it isn't a gigantic leap, in fact I think it's less of a leap than TBC -> WotLK. But still, I would rather see vanilla, TBC, and WotLK get some attention, instead of just the latest instance.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use