[fix][7315] Seal of Command

[Brigandier]

Paladins use SoM/SoB for abnormal damage, not SoC.

... You're joking right?

[most wanted]

... You're joking right?

I played bg's for the last 2 - 3 months on a server which always uses latest Mangos/UDB/SD2/ACID revs, so... no.

[mithusko]

http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=1022

http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=642

http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=498

after theese spell avening wrath http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=31884) will be started after 30 seconds cd but on our server you can use this spell during use spell ID 1022 642 498....

[Alez]

Paladins use SoM/SoB for abnormal damage, not SoC.

and Seal of Corruption / Seal of Vengeance

[Brigandier]

I played bg's for the last 2 - 3 months on a server which always uses latest Mangos/UDB/SD2/ACID revs, so... no.

SOC is dealing abnormal damage. also that other seal end up killing the paladin.

[Genocide]

SOC is dealing abnormal damage. also that other seal end up killing the paladin.

Agreed. SoC is most OP atm. 3,5k non crit while pala (dressed in blue, and I have 24k armor) white damage on me was for emm...1,5k? Wtf?

[demont]

Yesterday I could make SoC deal the damage the tooltip in the game says, after applying the following query:

UPDATE `spell_bonus_damage` SET `direct_bonus`=0, `dot_bonus`=0 WHERE  `entry`=20424

I wanted to confirm if it's ok what I did I mean if it's not a workaround.

[MrGhost]

Yesterday I could make SoC deal the damage the tooltip in the game says, after applying the following query:

UPDATE `spell_bonus_damage` SET `direct_bonus`=0, `dot_bonus`=0 WHERE  `entry`=20424

I wanted to confirm if it's ok what I did I mean if it's not a workaround.

Anybody? I mean, is thix 'fixing' it?