Jump to content

VladimirMangos

Members
  • Posts

    2813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Donations

    0.00 GBP 

Everything posted by VladimirMangos

  1. your changes just show that you not understand what you do...
  2. I think time to close thread
  3. It still have stability and functionality problems.
  4. not related to core and DB specific.
  5. I check at clean mangos-0.12 and not have described problem when reported in past.
  6. in fact pool system not require to be global global per instance state need only in same way as used for respawn timers Or maybe we talk about different Pool systems ^^
  7. Read config file data? src/game/World.cpp
  8. you also need add line for read value from config file for this option. Look at another options use in code. CONFIG_BOOL_ALLOW_TWO_SIDE_ADD_FRIEND for example. && !sWorld.getConfig(CONFIG_BOOL_ALLOW_TWO_SIDE_INTERACTION_TRADE) better add after team compare in if explcitly
  9. wowhead is less isn't 100% correct info source. spell.dbc description + offcial comments that this not typo is. Also wowhead show data for current client and mangos not suport it yet. So it or wrong or for 3.3.3. Base at expection last i update title...
  10. This not related to core in any form.... if someone want add like suppoort then it must be in scripting dll. None in core related to it work.
  11. As writed many times: this is not related to core. so any pros and cons also not related. This is pros/cons adding lua support in scripting library like SD2, not core... From core side not important what used for scripting until this used propertly in API part.
  12. yes, but currently each trainer have own list and in result this will be too slow... also not all class spells learned from trainers...
  13. Fix applied in [9624]. Base at confirmation quote from ANSI C standard in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/71424
  14. Fixed in [9623]. Thank you
  15. And this not related to mangos core... If you want discuss SD2 code style then discuss this at SD2 forum
  16. Existanse bracnhes that can work with some beta version not related to not supporting its by mangos devs. "mangos team not support something" meaning: you can use code that maybe we make public but and not ask us about anything and not attempt use our project forum for ask anyone aother. You can use like beta branches but this is totally not our problem. Ofc this not related useful patches for like branches that help develop new versions support. Closed as expected
  17. Don't know like spell 'all' and los intresting in it fixing. Provide _real_ info about specific problematic spell examples. Noneone need 'any/all/some' references.
  18. no support meaning: that like threads will closed always.
  19. Must be fixed in [9613]. I test code and not see described problem at x64
  20. Horrible life of birds.... when bird can't fly.... Base at fact ACHIEVEMENT_CRITERIA_REQUIRE_INSTANCE_SCRIPT stored in DB and instance script in related to script lib this is not related in first and second part to core.
  21. In [9582]. Thank you
  22. In [9544] with count support. Thank you
  23. Not sure that use like condition in giossips is correct way implement. But existence condition will not harm anything. Do you compile this code
  24. exctractor not always running software to be care about 0.001 speedup in price less clean code. As pointed if you want inlined code just move function in header with inline attribute.
  25. I close this thread as flame and nonsense. 1) As pointed mangos work with lot many loginned players as 300 and not required for 300 "The Best Hardware in The World". If you can't configure server _and_ mySQL then blame self not mangos. 2) other also commented already.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use