[patch/dev] pet stats

[sart13]

a brunch passVn much has been done by hacks, is also very much needed to be done. besides, he does not support their long-modification. I completely rewrote the system characteristics of pets about 2 months ago, it is now quite stable and maintains about 80% offlike opportunities pets (for comparison - a clean core 20%, brunch pasVn 60%).

but I do not do patches - anybody can do it yourself.

https://github.com/rsa/mangos

[Unkle Nuke]

Many thanks for your work on pets_rewrite!

Please, will you add that branch to Core Modifications or submit for review?

[sart13]

I support more than a dozen "major " modifications of the mangos, such as vehicles/zergtmn, go type 33, pet_stats, ahbot / xeross, anticheat, many instances in SD2 (with repaired boss spells). same number of minor modifications will not undertake to even count. and make patches for each separately - sorry, not my favor work...

[Unkle Nuke]

There is no need to create patches. I am very comfortable using Git branches.

I do hope you will reconsider. Your work, and the work of many independent developers, is as much a part of the MaNGOS community as any other works.

Since it seems pasdVn has abandoned his pet branches, your code is the only left to make pets work more correctly.

[sart13]

my code is unlikely to ever come into mangos. even offers me a small part of it was rejected by Vladimir. not to mention the rather large amount of code that even from my point of view is largely based on guesswork and assumptions about how it should work "true"

[Unkle Nuke]

I understand. People can have differing ideas on what is proper to do.

I still thank you for your work.

[Christian Schamara]

pla Update =( from rsa repo

[angeleyes]

what is the status of this? as there are still some problems with the scaling of pet stats.

[sart13]

what is the status of this? as there are still some problems with the scaling of pet stats.

what status? patches like this completely rejected by mangos team. pasdVn not worked under mangos code over 6 month. in R2 last commit of "pets_rewrite" feature (implementing ATTACK_SPEED_SCALING_TARGET for DK pets) be maked less then two week ago...

[Unkle Nuke]

In other words, unless you're willing and able to cherry pick the pets_rewrite code from the R2 fork and adapt it to MaNGOS, you're out of luck. Consider this particular project abandoned, unless someone wishes to step up, dust off the code, and resume work.

[sart13]

i publish adopted to mangos version over a year ago (http://ru-mangos.ru/showthread.php?t=2509). zero intrest from mangos team. now code highly improved, but base - same.

In addition, i can not publish anything on this forum (yesterday published a reference to a commit in R2 - the message was removed after 30 minutes).

[sart13]

Schmoozerd, I understand English - not for you nor for me, not native, and GoogleTranslate sucks. So that the meaning of half of the posts, I realized only approximately.

1. policy of the resource - that's his problem. I wrote to you, it was enough, and one fact deleting the message, so I stopped to respect him. in the future, I just act on the basis of the availability of this resource censorship.

2. published yesterday a reference to a commit fully fit into the theme roadmap - this targets will still have to implement.

3. whining about the fact that "rsa can not help the development of Mangos" frankly sick of it. can not help those who do not want it himself. should not complain, but to do this development. current state - is sad...